Oil and gas wells in Lea County, New Mexico.
Oil and gas wells in Lea County, New Mexico. Photographer: Mark Felix/Bloomberg

The Cheap and Easy Climate Fix That Can Cool the Planet Fast

Let a molecule of carbon dioxide escape into the atmosphere, and it stays for centuries. There’s more than enough up there to smother the planet like a too-warm quilt, trapping heat within and weirding the weather. The damage will be felt for generations.

But CO2 is only part of the patchwork of warming. Methane locks in far more heat in the short term and has been leaking just as relentlessly.

Methane Surge

Atmospheric concentrations of methane are 2.5x higher than in pre-industrial times

2K parts per billion

1

0

2020

800,000 years ago

2K parts per billion

1

0

2020

800,000 years ago

2K parts per billion

1

0

2020

800,000 years ago

Note: Direct measurements began in 1984

The difference is that methane’s power fades faster, within just decades. If we stopped emissions today, almost all the methane in the atmospheric blanket would degrade within a lifetime.

Methane vs. Carbon Dioxide
Scientists use a metric called the Global Warming Potential to judge the potency of greenhouse gases.
The measure shows that over the first two decades methane traps 84 times as much heat as the same amount of CO2.
Over a century, its warming power is 28 times that of CO2. That’s why cutting methane has such a big pay off: the faster emissions fall, the more warming we avoid.
Year 0
0
0.1
0.2 pW

Note: Absolute Global Warming Potential (AGWP) is a model that describes heat trapped by a kilogram of gas over time. This radiative forcing is measured in watts per square meter per kilogram per year, and is represented here in picowatts. Global Warming Potential (GWP) is the ratio of the AGWP of methane and of CO2.
Sources: Environmental Defense Fund; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

That’s why the U.S. and the European Union have been pressing countries to make a methane-cutting pledge. If enough nations sign up and meet the target—reaching a 30% reduction from last year’s levels by the end of the decade—the global movement against methane could prove to be one of the crucial achievements of the COP26 climate talks taking place in November in Glasgow, Scotland.

From Bloomberg Green Issue Five. Read more

Read more methane leak stories:

But much more could be done. Raising that target to 50% could help us prevent 0.3°C of warming by the 2040s and 0.5°C by 2100, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Given that the planet has already heated up 1.1°C, it would make a big difference to the world’s long-term warming forecast. Move quickly enough on methane, and the Paris Agreement goal of limiting the temperature increase to 1.5°C becomes far more feasible.

“The conversation is changing. Methane has risen to the fore,” says Sarah Smith, program director for super pollutants at Clean Air Task Force, a nonprofit advocacy group. “World leaders are starting to recognize that curbing methane is the only clear strategy to cut warming over the next two decades.”

Methane vs. Carbon Dioxide

An atmospheric census would find 200 molecules of CO2 for every one of methane. Yet methane has caused nearly a quarter of the world’s observed heating over the past two and a half centuries, while CO2 accounts for only about half.

The difference comes down to atmospheric physics and molecular mechanics. Every day the sun pumps vast amounts of energy into the planet. Some of it is absorbed by the land and oceans at the Earth’s surface, but most is reflected back into the sky in the form of infrared radiation. It’s on that journey back into space that most of the heat gets trapped under the quilt of greenhouse gases. The CO2 molecules number an astonishing 30 trillion trillion trillion trillion—that’s 30 followed by 36 zeros—all jiggling constantly while absorbing and reflecting infrared light.

Methane does the same, except that its molecular structure, consisting of a carbon atom surrounded by four hydrogen atoms, traps heat more effectively. But that molecular structure and elemental makeup also allows methane to break down faster. This process happens through its easy interaction with other gases, such as oxygen, through which it forms new compounds, including CO2.

Major Sources

Historically speaking, most of the methane released by direct human action has come from rice production and raising cows, which belch the greenhouse gas in significant quantities. But over the past 50 years, leaky fossil fuel infrastructure, much of it tied to the rise of natural gas, has also grown to become a supersized contributor.

Where Methane Comes From

Agriculture, energy, and waste are the largest contributors globally

Agriculture 42%

Energy 38%

Waste 18%

Livestock

Rice

Agriculture 42%

Energy 38%

Waste 18%

Livestock

Rice

Agriculture 42%

Energy 38%

Livestock

Waste 18%

Rice

Note: Map shows IPCC sector emissions in 2018 fitted to a database of emissions sites. Areas are shaded by total emissions from all sources; where multiple sources exist, the source with highest emissions is indicated.
Sources: European Commission; Joint Research Centre; World Resources Institute

The good news is that we have the tools we need right now to stop a large chunk of those emissions. Research by the United Nations found that as much as 80% of measures to curb leaks from oil and gas operations can be implemented at no cost, and many may even result in savings. Virtually all methane leaks from the coal sector could be painlessly eliminated.

“A huge amount of methane leakage is happening in the oil and gas industry,” says Cat Abreu, founder and executive director of Destination Zero, which seeks to eliminate fugitive methane. “It’s very cheap to cut, and, in many cases, it’s a job creator.”

Start Cutting Here

Tools already exist to eliminate 58% of global methane emissions by 2030

Technically and economically feasible

Technically feasible

Residual

Livestock

30% technically feasible

31% of global methane

emissions in 2030

Oil and Gas 85%

26%

Landfills 80%

14%

Coal mining 62%

11%

Rice 60%

8%

Wastewater 70%

6%

Technically and economically feasible

Technically feasible

Residual

Livestock

30% technically feasible

31% of global methane

emissions in 2030

Oil and Gas 85%

26%

Landfills 80%

14%

Coal mining 62%

11%

Rice 60%

8%

Wastewater 70%

6%

Technically and economically feasible

Technically feasible

Residual

Livestock

30% technically feasible

31% of global methane

emissions in 2030

Oil and Gas 85%

26%

Landfills 80%

14%

Coal mining 62%

11%

Rice 60%

8%

Wastewater 70%

6%

Note: Oil and gas companies’ existing plans to cut methane have been counted as economically feasible. Analysis uses baseline emissions scenario for 2030 by Höglund-Isaksson et al and assumes no further climate action.

The Quick Fixes

Tackling methane starts with the oil and gas industry, where up to 85% of methane emissions could be mitigated by 2030 using existing technology, according to a paper published in Environmental Research Letters last year. The gas has been leaking freely into the air for years from fossil fuel infrastructure, especially in major producing and consuming nations such as China, Russia and the U.S.

China, Russia and the U.S. Are Super-Emitters

Five regions are responsible for more than half of all methane leaks from energy infrastructure

Surgut

Taiyuan

Bismarck

Nanjing

El Paso

Novokuznetsk

China 23%

Russia 21%

U.S. 9%

Iran

3%

India

3%

China 23%

Taiyuan

Nanjing

Russia 21%

Surgut

Novokuznetsk

U.S. 9%

El Paso

Iran 3%

India 3%

Sources: European Commission; Joint Research Centre; World Resources Institute

Even though lost methane is a product that companies can sell to heat homes and spin power-plant turbines, most put little effort into tracking down fugitive plumes. Efforts by the U.S. government to monitor leaks since 2014 haven’t nearly reflected the full scope of the climate damage.

Using satellite data, researchers from Harvard found that emissions from the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico over an 11-month period were twice government figures. Emissions in the state of Pennsylvania are at least 15% higher than previously thought, according to a study by scientists at Cornell.

U.S. Emissions

The Permian and Appalachian basins are major sources of methane

Energy

Waste

Agriculture

Livestock

Rice

Seattle

Minneapolis

Detroit

New York

Chicago

San Francisco

Washington D.C.

Denver

St. Louis

Los Angeles

Appalachian Basin

San Diego

Atlanta

Permian Basin

Dallas

New Orleans

Houston

Miami

Waste

Energy

Agriculture

Livestock

Rice

Seattle

Minneapolis

San Francisco

New York

Denver

St. Louis

Appalachian

Permian

Houston

Energy

Waste

Agriculture

Livestock

Rice

Seattle

Minneapolis

Detroit

New York

San Francisco

Denver

St. Louis

Los Angeles

Appalachian

Permian

Dallas

Houston

Note: Map shows IPCC sector emissions in 2018 fitted to a database of emissions sites. Areas are shaded by total emissions from all sources, and where multiple sources exist the source with highest emissions is indicated.
Sources: European Commission; Joint Research Centre; World Resources Institute

The French satellite-analytics company Kayrros SAS estimates that the Permian basin has emitted more than 2 million tons of methane this year through September, equivalent to the annual emissions from at least 40 million passenger cars.

Leak Detection

Since the start of 2019, there have been more than 2,400 large leaks from energy extraction and landfills

1

2

10

25

50

250

1

2

10

25

50

250

1

2

10

25

50

250

Source: Kayrros

Until recently methane detection was more of a craft project than a science. Producers and regulators relied on crude techniques such as throwing a tarp over a pipe to see if it bubbled or sending workers out to inspect equipment. There are now a host of technologies to detect fugitive methane, from parsing satellite data to deploying drones and handheld infrared cameras. Once a leak is detected, plugging it isn’t that different from high-tech plumbing.

Regulations in many countries also require coal-mining companies to build infrastructure that recovers methane before it’s released. The gas is collected and burned to help power the plant’s operations, so the costs work out favorably in the end.

Waste

The trash piled up in the landfills doesn’t just release CO2 when it decomposes. In the absence of oxygen, methane forms instead. The gas builds up inside the mountains of waste, eventually escaping to the surface. Large clouds of methane in cities from Buenos Aires to Lahore have been attributed to landfills.

China, Indonesia, and the U.S. Are Super-Emitters

Five regions generate 45% of global methane emissions from waste

Beijing

Detroit

Nanjing

New York

Cologne

Moscow

Jakarta

Hong Kong

China 11%

Indonesia 9%

U.S. 9%

Russia 8%

EU-28 8%

China 11%

Beijing

Nanjing

Hong Kong

Indonesia 9%

Jakarta

U.S. 9%

Detroit

New York

Russia 8%

Moscow

EU-28 8%

Cologne

Sources: European Commission; Joint Research Centre; World Resources Institute

“Landfills are pretty complicated facilities,” says Bram Maasakkers, a researcher at the Netherlands Institute for Space Research. Scientists estimate that about 10% of human-caused methane comes from landfills, he says, “but how good the data is varies across the world.”

A growing number of landfill operators are starting to capture methane at their sites, which can be used to fuel the plants and garbage trucks. The Environmental Research Letters study estimates that 80% of emissions from landfills could be mitigated by 2030 using existing technology. The other solution is to cut down on waste and recycle more trash instead of discarding it.

Agriculture

The largest source of methane comes from growing the crops and meat that feed the world. And those emissions are set to grow as the global population increases and developing countries get richer.

India, China and Brazil Are Super-Emitters

Five regions make up 45% of global methane emissions from agriculture

New Delhi

Nanjing

Omaha

Amsterdam

Kolkata

Sao Paulo

Changsha

Milan

U.S. 6%

India 14%

China 9%

Brazil 9%

EU-28 7%

India 14%

New Delhi

Kolkata

China 9%

Nanjing

Changsha

Brazil 9%

Sao Paulo

EU-28 7%

Amsterdam

Milan

Omaha

U.S. 6%

Sources: European Commission; Joint Research Centre; World Resources Institute

More than two-thirds of the world’s rice is grown by flooding fields that cover an area twice as large as France. Microbes in the waterlogged soil produce large quantities of methane.

Research in China, one of the biggest producers of rice, has found it’s possible to cut methane in half by draining water from rice paddies in the middle of the growing season. The process also increases rice yields and saves water. Other researchers, in India and the Philippines, have found new varieties of rice that can thrive in dry fields—though their yields don’t yet match those of widely grown varieties.

60% of Emissions From Rice Could Be Mitigated by 2030

Rice cultivation is the dominant methane source in parts of Asia

Energy

Waste

Agriculture

Livestock

Rice

Urumqi

Tashkent

Beijing

Seoul

Tokyo

Kabul

Shanghai

Chengdu

New Delhi

Taipei

Kolkata

Hong Kong

Mumbai

Manila

Bangkok

Bangalore

Singapore

Jakarta

Energy

Waste

Agriculture

Livestock

Rice

Urumqi

Beijing

Tokyo

Kabul

Shanghai

New Delhi

Kolkata

Hong Kong

Manila

Bangkok

Singapore

Jakarta

Energy

Waste

Agriculture

Livestock

Rice

Urumqi

Tashkent

Beijing

Seoul

Tokyo

Kabul

Shanghai

Chengdu

New Delhi

Taipei

Kolkata

Hong Kong

Mumbai

Manila

Bangkok

Bangalore

Singapore

Jakarta

For the world’s 1.4 billion cows, the problem starts in the gut. The ruminants get help from bacteria to break down the hard-to-digest grasses they eat. The cost, however, is the production of methane as a byproduct.

31% of Emissions From Livestock Could Be Cut by 2030

Livestock are the dominant source of methane emissions in Europe

Energy

Waste

Agriculture

Livestock

Rice

Stockholm

Moscow

Hamburg

Amsterdam

Berlin

Warsaw

London

Kiev

Frankfurt

Paris

Vienna

Budapest

Milan

Bucharest

Barcelona

Istanbul

Madrid

Lisbon

Athens

Algiers

Mashhad

Aleppo

Tehran

Casablanca

Baghdad

Tripoli

Tel Aviv

Kuwait

Cairo

Dubai

Riyadh

Khartoum

Sanaa

Dakar

Kano

Addis Ababa

Lagos

Monrovia

Accra

Abidjan

Energy

Waste

Agriculture

Livestock

Rice

Stockholm

Moscow

Hamburg

Kiev

Paris

Budapest

Milan

Istanbul

Lisbon

Algiers

Baghdad

Tripoli

Cairo

Riyadh

Khartoum

Lagos

Energy

Waste

Agriculture

Livestock

Rice

Stockholm

Moscow

Berlin

Warsaw

London

Kiev

Paris

Budapest

Bucharest

Milan

Istanbul

Lisbon

Algiers

Tehran

Casablanca

Baghdad

Tripoli

Tel Aviv

Cairo

Dubai

Riyadh

Khartoum

Sanaa

Dakar

Kano

Addis Ababa

Lagos

Cutting these methane emissions is more challenging, but researchers are working on several potential solutions. One is to use special feed additives that help cows produce less methane. Cargill, the world’s largest agriculture company, is also urging suppliers to put special masks on cattle that would trap methane and convert it into CO2.

A dairy cow in Hertfordshire, England, wears a methane-reducing mask developed by Zelp Ltd. Photographer: Hollie Adams/Bloomberg

In the fight against global warming, methane has flown under the radar for too long. But there’s increasing recognition that tackling the invisible, odorless gas is one of the easiest, cheapest, and most feasible ways to make a real difference in slowing climate change. It’s the rare climate problem with a fix that can be felt by those alive right now, not their great-grandchildren.

“The world will continue to warm as long as CO2 is being pumped into the atmosphere,” concluded an August editorial in the scientific journal Nature. But curbing methane will help buy “humanity a bit more time to do what needs to be done.”