FCA wins case against Avacade in the Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal has upheld findings of breaches against Alexandra Associates (UK) Limited trading as Avacade Future Solutions (AA), and Craig and Lee Lummis in a case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

Update: 21 October 2021

This release was updated on 21 October 2021 to make clear that the Court of Appeal upheld findings that Craig Lummis and Lee Lummis were knowingly concerned in the breaches of Avacade and AA and Mr Fox was knowingly concerned in the breaches of Avacade, as opposed to their having engaged directly in the breaches. 

 

The FCA alleged, and the High Court found, that Avacade Limited (in liquidation) and AA engaged in arranging and promoting investments without FCA authorisation and made false and misleading statements to investors which induced them to transfer their pensions into self-invested personal pensions (SIPPs) and then into alternative investments such as HotPods (office space available for rent), tree plantations and Brazilian property developments. Craig Lummis, Lee Lummis and Raymond Fox were found to be knowingly concerned in these breaches. 

The appeal was brought by AA, Craig and Lee Lummis and today’s decision by the Court of Appeal upholds these findings.

Mark Steward, the FCA’s Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight said: 'The Court of Appeal decision vindicates the original decision and will help vindicate the rights of more than 2,000 investors who have lost pension money through the defendants’ conduct in leading them into these toxic and high risk investments.'

More than 2,000 consumers transferred in the region of £91.8m from their pensions into SIPPs. Approximately £68m of that amount was invested in products promoted by Avacade and AA and approximately £905,000 was invested into a fixed rate bond relating to a Brazilian property development. From these investments Avacade and AA earned commissions in the region of £10.8m. 

Many of the underlying investments have failed or are in liquidation. 

Next steps 

Following an application from the FCA, the High Court made an order in August 2020 against Avacade, AA, Craig Lummis, Lee Lummis and Raymond Fox to pay a total of £10,715,000 in restitution to members of the public who were induced to transfer their pensions into SIPPs. Today’s decision opens the way for the order to be enforced by the FCA by taking steps to recover monies from the Defendants, so that it can return them to the investors. 

Any Avacade/AA customers who believe they may have lost money and have not previously been contacted by the FCA about this matter, should contact the FCA to provide their details.

Notes to editors

  1. High Court orders illegal pension introducers Avacade, Alexandra Associates and their directors to pay £10,715,000 restitution to consumers
  2. High Court finds against illegal pension introducers, Avacade and others 
  3. Court of Appeal judgment 
  4. Find out how to report an unauthorised firm 
  5. Find out more information about the FCA

Page updates

: Information changed Updated to make clear that the Court of Appeal upheld findings that Craig Lummis and Lee Lummis were knowingly concerned in the breaches of Avacade and AA and Mr Fox was knowingly concerned in the breaches of Avacade, as opposed to their having engaged directly in the breaches.