Skip to navigationSkip to contentSkip to footerHelp using this website - Accessibility statement
Advertisement

LME cautious on low carbon aluminium push

Peter Ker
Peter KerResources reporter

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

London Metals Exchange (LME) chief executive Matthew Chamberlain says he is reluctant to "divide the world into good and bad" with regard to carbon emissions, as the 142-year-old institution mulls whether to introduce a discrete market for "low carbon aluminium".

Big aluminium producers like Russia's Rusal have been pushing the LME to introduce a special market for aluminium made with zero or minimal carbon emissions, and that push comes as the high carbon intensity of Australian aluminium smelters increasingly looms as a threat to their survival.

The four smelters on Australia's eastern seaboard are mostly powered by low quality coal, meaning their carbon footprint is dramatically bigger than those of rival smelters in other countries, such as Canada, which are powered by hydro-electricity.

US giant Alcoa stated last month that reducing the carbon footprint of its fleet was a major goal of an imminent cull of underperforming smelters that is expected to see Victoria's Portland smelter closed within 18 months.

The LME recently announced rules that will prevent trading on its platform of metals that fall short of child labour and ethical sourcing standards by 2022, but Mr Chamberlain said he did not expect such a binary approach to the carbon intensity of aluminium, which requires huge amounts of electricity in the manufacturing process.

Advertisement

''Low carbon is a good example where I don't think you can take the world and divide it into good or bad. But perhaps you can start to have better disclosure, better transparency and then maybe a parallel mechanism where if I have specific preferences as a consumer in terms of carbon footprint, I can go and source those brands and see if they command a premium,'' he told The Australian Financial Review, on a rare trip to Melbourne this week.

''It is clear that global consumer requirements have now matured to a level that I feel very comfortable saying that brands that don't embrace those responsible sourcing principles, they really should not be on the (LME) brand list because it is now just a global baseline expectation that there won't be these human rights violations in any supply chains.

''Low carbon is a much more complex area because we know large amounts of the global aluminium production chain are coal-fired and I don't think we are yet in a position, or indeed may ever be in a position, where the world as a whole is ready to say we are not going to use that.''

Rio Tinto has ramped up efforts in recent years to highlight the low carbon footprint of the aluminium it produces with hydro-electricity in Canada under the brand "RenewAL", which is claimed to have about 66 per cent less emissions than the average smelter.

Rio and Alcoa went a step further in 2018, launching a new joint venture with Apple Corporation called Elysis, which will seek to produce zero emissions aluminium for use in Apple products.

Advertisement

Even without a price premium for its low carbon footprint, Rio's hydro-powered smelters in Canada are cheaper producers of aluminium than 90 per cent of the world's smelters, suggesting the company has much to gain from the low carbon push even as it creates short term pain at Rio's struggling, coal fired smelters in Tasmania, Queensland and NSW.

Those Australian smelters, including one in New Zealand, have collectively lost more than $US150 million ($218 million) over the past year, and Rio flagged last month it was considering shutting its New Zealand smelter to curb losses.

Mr Chamberlain said his visit to Australia was an attempt to hear directly from industry about how they want the LME to evolve on carbon and other matters.

''We have to consider the right way of doing that because even the measurement of carbon content is immensely complex, and I think the important point is we don't want to be re-inventing anything, there is a number of industry bodies that have done a huge amount of work in this space, and it would not be helpful nor right for us to be trying to replicate that,'' he said.

Peter Ker covers resource companies for The Australian Financial Review, based in Melbourne. Connect with Peter on Twitter. Email Peter at pker@afr.com

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Read More

Latest In Mining

Fetching latest articles

Most Viewed In Companies