Gensler Rebuffs Regulatory Reach Critics in FIA Keynote
During the course of his speech, Gensler highlighted the achievements of US regulatory agencies in finalizing and enacting Dodd-Frank reforms over swaps trading, saying that ideas were now becoming a reality. In addressing the need for offshore affiliates of US financial institutions, and foreign institutions operating in the US to comply with Dodd-Frank mandates, he said that previous incidents involving the collapse of firms showed that contagion effects did not respect national boundaries.
"Looking forward, it's a priority that the Commission ensures the cross-border application of swaps market reform appropriately covers the risk of US affiliates operating offshore. During a default, risk knows no geographic border," he said. "If a run starts in one part of a modern financial institution, whether it's here or offshore, the risk comes back to our shores. That was true with AIG, which ran most of its swaps business out of the London neighborhood Mayfair. It was also true at Lehman Brothers, Citigroup, Bear Stearns and Long-Term Capital Management."
Various industry groups have criticized the perceived extra-territorial reach of Dodd-Frank Act requirements, saying that their operations could fall under the purview of US regulators even if their business in the US is minimal. Foreign regulators have also voiced criticism of the approach, and market participants have even said that in order to comply with some Dodd-Frank mandates, they will be forced to break the law in their own country.
Analogous Regimes
Gensler said that where appropriate, foreign competent authority regulation would be considered. However, the essence of the argument is that events with the potential to affect US markets should fall under US auspices.
"Thus, as the CFTC completes the cross-border guidance, I believe it's critical that Dodd-Frank swaps reform applies to transactions entered into by branches of US institutions offshore, between guaranteed affiliates offshore, and for hedge funds that are incorporated offshore but operate in the US," he continued. "Where there are comparable and comprehensive home country rules abroad, we can look to substituted compliance, but the transactions would still be covered."
Where there are comparable and comprehensive home country rules abroad, we can look to substituted compliance, but the transactions would still be covered.
He encouraged foreign firms that would seek to substitute US compliance with that of their home regulator to contact the CFTC immediately.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
DSB says industry is ready to meet UPI mandate ahead of deadline
The Unique Product Identifier will be required for certain OTC derivatives in the EU at the end of April, following US adoption in January.
‘Very careful thought’: T+1 will introduce costs, complexities for ETF traders
When the US moves to T+1 at the end of May 2024, firms trading ETFs will need to automate their workflows as much as possible to avoid "settlement misalignment" and additional costs.
Court case probes open-source licenses as movement stands at crossroads
The Software Freedom Conservancy’s lawsuit against TV-maker Vizio begins trial in California, raising questions about open-source licenses and the risks posed by adhering to them.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Countdown to T+1
DTCC’s Val Wotton joins the podcast this week to discuss the impending move to T+1 in the US.
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest
The Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act seeks to fix a market abuse loophole by declaring that AI algorithms do not have brains.
Waters Wrap: The rise of AI washing… and regulation washing?
The SEC recently levied fines against two investment advisors over “AI washing”. Anthony takes issue with the announcement.
Prepare now for the inevitable: T+1 isn’t just a US challenge
The DTCC’s Val Wotton believes that firms around the globe should view North America’s move to T+1 as an opportunity—because it’s inevitable.
Most read
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: All the winners
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: Best sell-side front-office platform—Bloomberg
- Deutsche Börse democratizes data with Marketplace offering