Why Is There So Much Attorney Hiring Volatility At The Major Am Law 100 Firms?
We can generally expect more and more partner-, associate-, and counsel-level lateral movement from firms with relatively higher lateral volatility.
Ed. note: This is the latest installment in a series of posts from Lateral Link’s team of expert contributors. Michael Allen is the CEO of Lateral Link. He is based in the Los Angeles office and focuses exclusively on Partner and General Counsel placements for top firms and companies. Prior to founding Lateral Link in 2006, he worked as an attorney at both Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Irell & Manella LLP. Michael graduated summa cum laude from the University of California, San Diego before earning his JD, cum laude, from Harvard Law School.
In the prior rolling 12 months, we have seen over 7,000 attorney GAINS at the major Am Law 100 firms and over 12,000 attorney LOSSES at the major Am Law 100 firms. Some folks outside the legal industry may find this number hard to believe given how sticky attorneys appear in their jobs.
Here is a quick snapshot of the attorney gains made by the major Am Law 100 firms courtesy of Leopard Solutions (Laterals into Firms – September 8, 2016 to September 8, 2017).
Firm | Associate | Partner | Counsel | Total |
Total | 4705 | 1701 | 864 | 7270 |
Akerman LLP | 46 | 28 | 2 | 76 |
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP | 42 | 10 | 11 | 63 |
Alston & Bird LLP | 40 | 16 | 5 | 61 |
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP | 25 | 3 | 3 | 31 |
Baker Botts LLP | 29 | 19 | 5 | 53 |
Baker Donelson | 24 | 6 | 12 | 42 |
Baker McKenzie | 85 | 38 | 11 | 134 |
BakerHostetler | 42 | 21 | 13 | 75 |
Ballard Spahr LLP | 31 | 6 | 7 | 44 |
Barnes & Thornburg LLP | 11 | 17 | 8 | 36 |
Blank Rome LLP | 37 | 13 | 9 | 59 |
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP | 10 | 8 | 3 | 21 |
Bryan Cave LLP | 29 | 8 | 11 | 48 |
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP | 12 | 4 | 6 | 22 |
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP | 20 | 0 | 1 | 21 |
Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton | 33 | 2 | 2 | 37 |
Cooley LLP | 63 | 21 | 8 | 92 |
Covington & Burling | 63 | 13 | 20 | 96 |
Cozen O Connor | 41 | 48 | 9 | 98 |
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
Crowell & Moring LLP | 31 | 16 | 14 | 61 |
Davis Polk & Wardwell | 47 | 3 | 9 | 59 |
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP | 33 | 5 | 4 | 42 |
Dechert LLP | 43 | 10 | 1 | 54 |
DLA Piper | 144 | 81 | 27 | 252 |
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | 30 | 16 | 7 | 53 |
Duane Morris LLP | 35 | 17 | 14 | 66 |
Faegre Baker Daniels | 36 | 9 | 5 | 50 |
Fenwick & West | 21 | 4 | 2 | 27 |
Fish & Richardson | 13 | 1 | 0 | 14 |
Foley & Lardner LLP | 24 | 13 | 15 | 52 |
Fox Rothschild LLP | 44 | 28 | 12 | 84 |
Fragomen | 55 | 1 | 1 | 57 |
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP | 35 | 8 | 10 | 53 |
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | 54 | 23 | 4 | 81 |
Goodwin | 61 | 15 | 8 | 84 |
Greenberg Traurig LLP | 76 | 41 | 14 | 131 |
Haynes and Boone, LLP | 20 | 6 | 4 | 30 |
Hogan Lovells | 108 | 29 | 3 | 140 |
Holland & Knight LLP | 47 | 35 | 15 | 97 |
Hunton & Williams LLP | 37 | 6 | 4 | 47 |
Husch Blackwell LLP | 24 | 10 | 18 | 52 |
Jackson Lewis PC | 58 | 21 | 18 | 97 |
Jenner & Block LLP | 16 | 19 | 8 | 43 |
Jones Day | 94 | 38 | 11 | 143 |
K & L Gates | 67 | 38 | 18 | 123 |
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | 25 | 11 | 9 | 45 |
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP | 26 | 6 | 10 | 42 |
King & Spalding LLP | 52 | 28 | 9 | 89 |
Kirkland & Ellis LLP | 182 | 56 | 7 | 245 |
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP | 23 | 1 | 1 | 25 |
Latham & Watkins LLP | 133 | 22 | 14 | 169 |
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | 170 | 86 | 4 | 260 |
Littler Mendelson PC | 126 | 14 | 9 | 149 |
Locke Lord LLP | 19 | 7 | 11 | 37 |
Mayer Brown LLP | 60 | 19 | 10 | 89 |
McDermott Will & Emery LLP | 57 | 42 | 8 | 107 |
McGuireWoods LLP | 73 | 27 | 12 | 112 |
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP | 42 | 10 | 3 | 55 |
Mintz Levin | 40 | 2 | 6 | 48 |
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP | 120 | 38 | 12 | 170 |
Morrison & Foerster LLP | 56 | 12 | 7 | 75 |
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough | 28 | 20 | 17 | 65 |
Nixon Peabody LLP | 24 | 13 | 7 | 44 |
Norton Rose Fulbright | 66 | 21 | 22 | 109 |
O Melveny & Myers LLP | 15 | 9 | 6 | 30 |
Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC | 75 | 22 | 38 | 135 |
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | 56 | 14 | 4 | 74 |
Paul Hastings LLP | 37 | 6 | 6 | 49 |
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP | 29 | 3 | 9 | 41 |
Pepper Hamilton LLP | 28 | 2 | 5 | 35 |
Perkins Coie | 64 | 15 | 13 | 92 |
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP | 28 | 20 | 10 | 58 |
Polsinelli PC | 47 | 41 | 5 | 93 |
Proskauer Rose LLP | 42 | 12 | 4 | 58 |
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | 47 | 12 | 2 | 61 |
Reed Smith LLP | 74 | 32 | 11 | 117 |
Ropes & Gray LLP | 53 | 5 | 4 | 62 |
Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP | 12 | 2 | 4 | 18 |
Seyfarth Shaw LLP | 42 | 16 | 29 | 87 |
Shearman & Sterling LLP | 39 | 10 | 13 | 62 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP | 43 | 18 | 7 | 68 |
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP | 8 | 2 | 4 | 14 |
Sidley Austin LLP | 87 | 23 | 13 | 123 |
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 29 | 6 | 12 | 47 |
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | 50 | 6 | 9 | 65 |
Squire Patton Boggs | 46 | 22 | 9 | 77 |
Steptoe & Johnson LLP | 14 | 11 | 1 | 26 |
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP | 22 | 4 | 8 | 34 |
Troutman Sanders LLP | 42 | 20 | 11 | 73 |
Venable LLP | 42 | 17 | 11 | 70 |
Vinson & Elkins LLP | 30 | 3 | 1 | 34 |
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP | 33 | 4 | 1 | 38 |
White & Case | 43 | 15 | 2 | 60 |
Williams & Connolly LLP | 7 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP | 30 | 8 | 7 | 45 |
WilmerHale | 44 | 10 | 5 | 59 |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | 50 | 3 | 9 | 62 |
Winston & Strawn LLP | 72 | 68 | 10 | 150 |
On the other hand, I find it equally impressive how many attorneys the major Am Law 100 firms have shed during the same time period — a whopping 12,000!
Here is a quick snapshot of the attorney losses made by the major Am Law 100 firms courtesy of Leopard Solutions (Laterals into Firms – September 8, 2016 to September 8, 2017).
Firm | Associate | Partner | Counsel | Total |
Total | 8160 | 2488 | 1607 | 12255 |
Akerman LLP | 33 | 34 | 7 | 74 |
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP | 48 | 14 | 35 | 97 |
Alston & Bird LLP | 54 | 20 | 10 | 84 |
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP | 111 | 22 | 16 | 149 |
Baker Botts LLP | 90 | 21 | 7 | 118 |
Baker Donelson | 35 | 18 | 28 | 81 |
Baker McKenzie | 164 | 74 | 17 | 255 |
BakerHostetler | 65 | 33 | 16 | 114 |
Ballard Spahr LLP | 43 | 12 | 18 | 73 |
Barnes & Thornburg LLP | 19 | 16 | 11 | 46 |
Blank Rome LLP | 43 | 16 | 23 | 82 |
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP | 31 | 12 | 3 | 46 |
Bryan Cave LLP | 51 | 19 | 33 | 103 |
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP | 62 | 18 | 20 | 100 |
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP | 50 | 1 | 8 | 59 |
Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton | 168 | 4 | 3 | 175 |
Cooley LLP | 75 | 20 | 14 | 109 |
Covington & Burling | 64 | 3 | 10 | 77 |
Cozen O Connor | 31 | 23 | 12 | 66 |
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP | 85 | 4 | 3 | 92 |
Crowell & Moring LLP | 26 | 15 | 28 | 69 |
Davis Polk & Wardwell | 145 | 5 | 11 | 161 |
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP | 95 | 3 | 4 | 102 |
Dechert LLP | 126 | 10 | 7 | 143 |
DLA Piper | 182 | 83 | 56 | 321 |
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | 58 | 15 | 15 | 88 |
Duane Morris LLP | 44 | 28 | 10 | 82 |
Faegre Baker Daniels | 41 | 23 | 9 | 73 |
Fenwick & West | 38 | 4 | 2 | 44 |
Fish & Richardson | 25 | 27 | 6 | 58 |
Foley & Lardner LLP | 53 | 27 | 27 | 107 |
Fox Rothschild LLP | 42 | 33 | 11 | 86 |
Fragomen | 66 | 3 | 3 | 72 |
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP | 61 | 10 | 3 | 74 |
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | 133 | 16 | 3 | 152 |
Goodwin | 106 | 17 | 9 | 132 |
Greenberg Traurig LLP | 120 | 64 | 28 | 212 |
Haynes and Boone, LLP | 49 | 11 | 16 | 76 |
Hogan Lovells | 162 | 24 | 30 | 216 |
Holland & Knight LLP | 54 | 45 | 23 | 122 |
Hunton & Williams LLP | 66 | 19 | 10 | 95 |
Husch Blackwell LLP | 39 | 22 | 19 | 80 |
Jackson Lewis PC | 56 | 27 | 7 | 90 |
Jenner & Block LLP | 37 | 14 | 5 | 56 |
Jones Day | 233 | 46 | 32 | 311 |
K & L Gates | 143 | 95 | 24 | 262 |
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | 30 | 17 | 10 | 57 |
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP | 44 | 14 | 7 | 65 |
King & Spalding LLP | 67 | 35 | 9 | 111 |
Kirkland & Ellis LLP | 178 | 63 | 11 | 252 |
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP | 22 | 4 | 9 | 35 |
Latham & Watkins LLP | 226 | 21 | 13 | 260 |
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | 133 | 86 | 5 | 224 |
Littler Mendelson PC | 83 | 30 | 8 | 121 |
Locke Lord LLP | 49 | 49 | 45 | 143 |
Mayer Brown LLP | 133 | 35 | 19 | 187 |
McDermott Will & Emery LLP | 52 | 57 | 12 | 121 |
McGuireWoods LLP | 79 | 26 | 33 | 138 |
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP | 92 | 9 | 5 | 106 |
Mintz Levin | 35 | 19 | 6 | 60 |
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP | 137 | 37 | 39 | 213 |
Morrison & Foerster LLP | 113 | 23 | 27 | 163 |
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough | 24 | 18 | 15 | 57 |
Nixon Peabody LLP | 49 | 27 | 20 | 96 |
Norton Rose Fulbright | 257 | 96 | 58 | 411 |
O Melveny & Myers LLP | 56 | 9 | 26 | 90 |
Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC | 47 | 21 | 17 | 85 |
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | 93 | 26 | 15 | 134 |
Paul Hastings LLP | 145 | 26 | 19 | 190 |
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP | 117 | 6 | 12 | 135 |
Pepper Hamilton LLP | 48 | 28 | 11 | 87 |
Perkins Coie | 50 | 23 | 30 | 103 |
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP | 42 | 18 | 20 | 80 |
Polsinelli PC | 49 | 47 | 15 | 111 |
Proskauer Rose LLP | 91 | 18 | 13 | 122 |
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | 82 | 7 | 7 | 96 |
Reed Smith LLP | 113 | 61 | 24 | 198 |
Ropes & Gray LLP | 162 | 37 | 10 | 209 |
Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP | 39 | 4 | 3 | 46 |
Seyfarth Shaw LLP | 41 | 27 | 35 | 103 |
Shearman & Sterling LLP | 74 | 16 | 18 | 108 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP | 57 | 15 | 13 | 85 |
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP | 23 | 15 | 6 | 44 |
Sidley Austin LLP | 169 | 51 | 47 | 267 |
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 119 | 12 | 14 | 145 |
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | 170 | 12 | 16 | 198 |
Squire Patton Boggs | 79 | 34 | 19 | 132 |
Steptoe & Johnson LLP | 19 | 12 | 10 | 41 |
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP | 118 | 4 | 11 | 133 |
Troutman Sanders LLP | 44 | 25 | 11 | 80 |
Venable LLP | 40 | 25 | 15 | 80 |
Vinson & Elkins LLP | 71 | 20 | 9 | 100 |
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz | 20 | 0 | 4 | 24 |
Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP | 164 | 15 | 6 | 185 |
White & Case | 115 | 40 | 12 | 167 |
Williams & Connolly LLP | 10 | 5 | 4 | 19 |
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP | 73 | 7 | 4 | 84 |
WilmerHale | 78 | 20 | 48 | 146 |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | 114 | 12 | 20 | 146 |
Winston & Strawn LLP | 90 | 50 | 16 | 156 |
Some of the reasons are obvious and expected, such as retiring, relocating, going in-house, or just getting out of the lawyer business altogether. Given Lateral Link’s day-to-day routine of assisting attorneys to make lateral moves, I’d like to focus on the lateral attorney market. Below are some general observations.
Net partner gain probably indicates accretive revenue growth (to the extent we are talking about equity partners). Net associate gain is less indicative of firm health. An interesting analogy with associate movement is similar to that of CBOE’s Volatility Index, known by its ticker symbol VIX, which according to Wikipedia is a popular measure of the implied volatility of S&P 500 index options. We are oftentimes a bit more suspect of firms with a relatively higher lateral associate VIX, meaning high gains accompanied with high losses, i.e., a revolving door. Although associates coming and going is common place, the degree of volatility affects the firm’s stability (less so in terms of profits because associates are grinding out the hours and not bringing in new business and more so in terms of culture).
In short, we can generally expect more and more partner-, associate-, and counsel-level lateral movement from firms with relatively higher lateral volatility. That isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but is something that we analyze and try to understand when assisting our candidates to make informed decisions about their next job.
Lateral Link is one of the top-rated international legal recruiting firms. With over 14 offices world-wide, Lateral Link specializes in placing attorneys at the most prestigious law firms and companies in the world. Managed by former practicing attorneys from top law schools, Lateral Link has a tradition of hiring lawyers to execute the lateral leaps of practicing attorneys. Click ::here:: to find out more about us.