Why Is There So Much Attorney Hiring Volatility At The Major Am Law 100 Firms?

We can generally expect more and more partner-, associate-, and counsel-level lateral movement from firms with relatively higher lateral volatility. 

Michael Allen

Ed. note: This is the latest installment in a series of posts from Lateral Link’s team of expert contributors. Michael Allen is the CEO of Lateral Link. He is based in the Los Angeles office and focuses exclusively on Partner and General Counsel placements for top firms and companies. Prior to founding Lateral Link in 2006, he worked as an attorney at both Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Irell & Manella LLP. Michael graduated summa cum laude from the University of California, San Diego before earning his JD, cum laude, from Harvard Law School.

In the prior rolling 12 months, we have seen over 7,000 attorney GAINS at the major Am Law 100 firms and over 12,000 attorney LOSSES at the major Am Law 100 firms.  Some folks outside the legal industry may find this number hard to believe given how sticky attorneys appear in their jobs.

Here is a quick snapshot of the attorney gains made by the major Am Law 100 firms courtesy of Leopard Solutions (Laterals into Firms – September 8, 2016 to September 8, 2017).

Firm Associate Partner Counsel Total
Total 4705 1701 864 7270
Akerman LLP 46 28 2 76
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP 42 10 11 63
Alston & Bird LLP 40 16 5 61
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP 25 3 3 31
Baker Botts LLP 29 19 5 53
Baker Donelson 24 6 12 42
Baker McKenzie 85 38 11 134
BakerHostetler 42 21 13 75
Ballard Spahr LLP 31 6 7 44
Barnes & Thornburg LLP 11 17 8 36
Blank Rome LLP 37 13 9 59
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP 10 8 3 21
Bryan Cave LLP 29 8 11 48
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP 12 4 6 22
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP 20 0 1 21
Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton 33 2 2 37
Cooley LLP 63 21 8 92
Covington & Burling 63 13 20 96
Cozen O Connor 41 48 9 98
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP 15 0 0 15
Crowell & Moring LLP 31 16 14 61
Davis Polk & Wardwell 47 3 9 59
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP 33 5 4 42
Dechert LLP 43 10 1 54
DLA Piper 144 81 27 252
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 30 16 7 53
Duane Morris LLP 35 17 14 66
Faegre Baker Daniels 36 9 5 50
Fenwick & West 21 4 2 27
Fish & Richardson 13 1 0 14
Foley & Lardner LLP 24 13 15 52
Fox Rothschild LLP 44 28 12 84
Fragomen 55 1 1 57
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP 35 8 10 53
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 54 23 4 81
Goodwin 61 15 8 84
Greenberg Traurig LLP 76 41 14 131
Haynes and Boone, LLP 20 6 4 30
Hogan Lovells 108 29 3 140
Holland & Knight LLP 47 35 15 97
Hunton & Williams LLP 37 6 4 47
Husch Blackwell LLP 24 10 18 52
Jackson Lewis PC 58 21 18 97
Jenner & Block LLP 16 19 8 43
Jones Day 94 38 11 143
K & L Gates 67 38 18 123
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 25 11 9 45
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP 26 6 10 42
King & Spalding LLP 52 28 9 89
Kirkland & Ellis LLP 182 56 7 245
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP 23 1 1 25
Latham & Watkins LLP 133 22 14 169
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP 170 86 4 260
Littler Mendelson PC 126 14 9 149
Locke Lord LLP 19 7 11 37
Mayer Brown LLP 60 19 10 89
McDermott Will & Emery LLP 57 42 8 107
McGuireWoods LLP 73 27 12 112
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP 42 10 3 55
Mintz Levin 40 2 6 48
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 120 38 12 170
Morrison & Foerster LLP 56 12 7 75
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough 28 20 17 65
Nixon Peabody LLP 24 13 7 44
Norton Rose Fulbright 66 21 22 109
O Melveny & Myers LLP 15 9 6 30
Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC 75 22 38 135
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 56 14 4 74
Paul Hastings LLP 37 6 6 49
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 29 3 9 41
Pepper Hamilton LLP 28 2 5 35
Perkins Coie 64 15 13 92
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 28 20 10 58
Polsinelli PC 47 41 5 93
Proskauer Rose LLP 42 12 4 58
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 47 12 2 61
Reed Smith LLP 74 32 11 117
Ropes & Gray LLP 53 5 4 62
Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP 12 2 4 18
Seyfarth Shaw LLP 42 16 29 87
Shearman & Sterling LLP 39 10 13 62
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 43 18 7 68
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP 8 2 4 14
Sidley Austin LLP 87 23 13 123
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP 29 6 12 47
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 50 6 9 65
Squire Patton Boggs 46 22 9 77
Steptoe & Johnson LLP 14 11 1 26
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP 22 4 8 34
Troutman Sanders LLP 42 20 11 73
Venable LLP 42 17 11 70
Vinson & Elkins LLP 30 3 1 34
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 3 0 0 3
Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP 33 4 1 38
White & Case 43 15 2 60
Williams & Connolly LLP 7 0 1 8
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 30 8 7 45
WilmerHale 44 10 5 59
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 50 3 9 62
Winston & Strawn LLP 72 68 10 150

On the other hand, I find it equally impressive how many attorneys the major Am Law 100 firms have shed during the same time period — a whopping 12,000!

Here is a quick snapshot of the attorney losses made by the major Am Law 100 firms courtesy of Leopard Solutions (Laterals into Firms – September 8, 2016 to September 8, 2017).

Firm Associate Partner Counsel Total
Total 8160 2488 1607 12255
Akerman LLP 33 34 7 74
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP 48 14 35 97
Alston & Bird LLP 54 20 10 84
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP 111 22 16 149
Baker Botts LLP 90 21 7 118
Baker Donelson 35 18 28 81
Baker McKenzie 164 74 17 255
BakerHostetler 65 33 16 114
Ballard Spahr LLP 43 12 18 73
Barnes & Thornburg LLP 19 16 11 46
Blank Rome LLP 43 16 23 82
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP 31 12 3 46
Bryan Cave LLP 51 19 33 103
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP 62 18 20 100
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP 50 1 8 59
Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton 168 4 3 175
Cooley LLP 75 20 14 109
Covington & Burling 64 3 10 77
Cozen O Connor 31 23 12 66
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP 85 4 3 92
Crowell & Moring LLP 26 15 28 69
Davis Polk & Wardwell 145 5 11 161
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP 95 3 4 102
Dechert LLP 126 10 7 143
DLA Piper 182 83 56 321
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 58 15 15 88
Duane Morris LLP 44 28 10 82
Faegre Baker Daniels 41 23 9 73
Fenwick & West 38 4 2 44
Fish & Richardson 25 27 6 58
Foley & Lardner LLP 53 27 27 107
Fox Rothschild LLP 42 33 11 86
Fragomen 66 3 3 72
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP 61 10 3 74
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 133 16 3 152
Goodwin 106 17 9 132
Greenberg Traurig LLP 120 64 28 212
Haynes and Boone, LLP 49 11 16 76
Hogan Lovells 162 24 30 216
Holland & Knight LLP 54 45 23 122
Hunton & Williams LLP 66 19 10 95
Husch Blackwell LLP 39 22 19 80
Jackson Lewis PC 56 27 7 90
Jenner & Block LLP 37 14 5 56
Jones Day 233 46 32 311
K & L Gates 143 95 24 262
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 30 17 10 57
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP 44 14 7 65
King & Spalding LLP 67 35 9 111
Kirkland & Ellis LLP 178 63 11 252
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP 22 4 9 35
Latham & Watkins LLP 226 21 13 260
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP 133 86 5 224
Littler Mendelson PC 83 30 8 121
Locke Lord LLP 49 49 45 143
Mayer Brown LLP 133 35 19 187
McDermott Will & Emery LLP 52 57 12 121
McGuireWoods LLP 79 26 33 138
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP 92 9 5 106
Mintz Levin 35 19 6 60
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 137 37 39 213
Morrison & Foerster LLP 113 23 27 163
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough 24 18 15 57
Nixon Peabody LLP 49 27 20 96
Norton Rose Fulbright 257 96 58 411
O Melveny & Myers LLP 56 9 26 90
Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC 47 21 17 85
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 93 26 15 134
Paul Hastings LLP 145 26 19 190
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 117 6 12 135
Pepper Hamilton LLP 48 28 11 87
Perkins Coie 50 23 30 103
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 42 18 20 80
Polsinelli PC 49 47 15 111
Proskauer Rose LLP 91 18 13 122
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 82 7 7 96
Reed Smith LLP 113 61 24 198
Ropes & Gray LLP 162 37 10 209
Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP 39 4 3 46
Seyfarth Shaw LLP 41 27 35 103
Shearman & Sterling LLP 74 16 18 108
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 57 15 13 85
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP 23 15 6 44
Sidley Austin LLP 169 51 47 267
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP 119 12 14 145
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 170 12 16 198
Squire Patton Boggs 79 34 19 132
Steptoe & Johnson LLP 19 12 10 41
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP 118 4 11 133
Troutman Sanders LLP 44 25 11 80
Venable LLP 40 25 15 80
Vinson & Elkins LLP 71 20 9 100
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 20 0 4 24
Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP 164 15 6 185
White & Case 115 40 12 167
Williams & Connolly LLP 10 5 4 19
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 73 7 4 84
WilmerHale 78 20 48 146
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 114 12 20 146
Winston & Strawn LLP 90 50 16 156

Some of the reasons are obvious and expected, such as retiring, relocating, going in-house, or just getting out of the lawyer business altogether.  Given Lateral Link’s day-to-day routine of assisting attorneys to make lateral moves, I’d like to focus on the lateral attorney market.  Below are some general observations.

Net partner gain probably indicates accretive revenue growth (to the extent we are talking about equity partners).  Net associate gain is less indicative of firm health.  An interesting analogy with associate movement is similar to that of CBOE’s Volatility Index, known by its ticker symbol VIX, which according to Wikipedia is a popular measure of the implied volatility of S&P 500 index options.  We are oftentimes a bit more suspect of firms with a relatively higher lateral associate VIX, meaning high gains accompanied with high losses, i.e., a revolving door.  Although associates coming and going is common place, the degree of volatility affects the firm’s stability (less so in terms of profits because associates are grinding out the hours and not bringing in new business and more so in terms of culture).

In short, we can generally expect more and more partner-, associate-, and counsel-level lateral movement from firms with relatively higher lateral volatility.  That isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but is something that we analyze and try to understand when assisting our candidates to make informed decisions about their next job.


Lateral Link is one of the top-rated international legal recruiting firms. With over 14 offices world-wide, Lateral Link specializes in placing attorneys at the most prestigious law firms and companies in the world. Managed by former practicing attorneys from top law schools, Lateral Link has a tradition of hiring lawyers to execute the lateral leaps of practicing attorneys. Click ::here:: to find out more about us.