Index licensing fees: heading for a fall?

Index licensing fees have long been a bone of contention among providers of exchange-traded funds and structured products that use industry benchmarks. But can a new breed of low-cost index really challenge the prevailing licensing model? Jonathan López reports

old-cash-register-keys-plastic-closeup

Index providers tend to charge companies wishing to use their indexes licensing fees based on assets under management (AUM), which means the bigger the exchange-traded fund (ETF), the greater is the revenue from fees that goes to the index provider. And with the total volume of ETFs in existence now in excess of $2 trillion, some market participants believe index firms have never had it so good and are questioning the rationale behind the fee structures.

"The AUM-based model makes no economic

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here